THE WOKE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX-SPONSORED MISCEGENATION OF BRITAIN

Every TV show, film, advertisement and billboard today, always and without exception, shows, as the model of sexual attraction, coupledom or, most farcically, family life, an African male with a White female and, in the case of presenting a family, with mixed-race children. The advertising industry spent £46.7 billion last year, with the UK Government spending another £449 million. They didn’t do that to give us a consumer choice: they did it to tell us what to be. Identity is the ultimate consumer choice, and White girls, who are the demographic most susceptible to advertising, are being told to pair up with African men.

BY SIMON ELDER ON X / READ AND SUBSCRIBE TO SIMON ELDER ON X

A relentless, pursued programme of White genocide is promoted across every media platform. In 2025, 310,456 babies were born to White British mothers, just 53% of all births, so White people are not reproducing. The birth rate in the UK is 1.39 per woman, but that includes the 24 million Africans and South Asians who have been encouraged to produce 3-4 children per woman under the recent changes to the child benefit cap. And even if she has a child, once a White mother is impregnated by an African man, unless she goes on to have a child with a White father, the genetic line passed down to her over thousands of years is at an end. Her mixed-race child will grow up Black, which is a transnational identity that defines behaviour across the world. The millions of African men brought to Britain and housed at our expense across our country have been brought here to breed the British people into the mongrel race we are told by the ideologues of woke we always have been. Whether through rape or simply by impregnating as many women as possible, it is, perhaps, the one thing African men are good at. Or do you have another explanation for this propaganda?

Why are more and more White girls attracted to African men, and particularly to immigrants? On friday night I was in a pub in Soho, and across the road there was a launch for a record shop. I went for a fag and had a good look at the people attending. There were about 50-60 both inside and outside the shop. Three quarters of them were males, and with one or two exceptions they were all Africans. Of the dozen or so females, every single one was White. They were the kind of girls Africans like: blonde, slim, dressed like hookers, pornographic, and doting on the sullen, monosyllabic men-children with their jeans hanging below their buttocks, wearing jewellery that would make Liberace blush. For my generation, this is inexplicable, so I thought about the cause.

I live on a council estate in South London, and have known many African men, and they all say the same thing: White girls put up with their ‘shit’ (as they put it) more than African girls do. I imagine this is partly down to the fact that over half the African families in Britain are raised by single mothers, since African males do not hang around to support and raise their children but go off to impregnate a dozen other girls. The girls in the family, therefore, are raised by the kind of violent, big-mouthed African women we have to put up with in Britain, and copy their model. Equally, when African boys grow into African men-children, they want a girl as little like their mothers as possible.

This breeds enormous jealousy and hatred of White girls in African girls. They see that every African man who attains any degree of success, whether that’s in music, drug dealing or politics, immediately surrounds himself with White women. This applies as much to the ‘hoes’ — as African men charmingly refer to women — with which someone like Kanye West (who displays his White wife almost naked as if she were in a slave market) as it does to David Lammy (whose wife, despite his performed outrage at Briton’s role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, is also White). But if you want an example of the visceral hatred of White women this produces in African women, have a look at statements by a Black supremacist like Dawn Butler, the African MP for Brent.

I’ve known a number of White women who had a child with an African when they were young, and without exception the African man-child abandoned them to raise their child alone. Despite this, the women still retain an illogical allegiance to Africans, and particularly African men. For not only do African men abandon these ‘baby mamas’ — as they charmingly refer to the women, Black and White, that they impregnate and abandon — but in the time they are with them — which often lasts many years after they have left, using the council homes the woman was given for being a single mother to stay at when needed — African men treat White women like shit.

That’s what the African males I spoke with meant when they spoke of White girls putting up with their ‘shit’: not just their infidelity, irresponsibility, financial dependence on them, criminal activities, and generally behaving like the adolescents they remain into physical adulthood, but the domestic abuse of women in general, and of White women in particular.

X is awash with smartphone footage of African men punching and otherwise brutalising their White ‘hoes’. For just as White women, for African men, are the trophies of their dream of conquest, so White women bear the brunt of their anger when reality fails to live up to their illusions.

So why, then, given the general uselessness of African men, their stupidity, their emotional stuntedness, their lack of financial success, their propensity for crime, their brutish mistreatment of women, their childishness and their general all-round crap behaviour, were these White girls so attracted to the Africans I saw on Friday night?

Well, one reason is that every TV show, film, advertisement and billboard today, always and without exception, shows, as the model of sexual attraction, coupledom or, most farcically, family life, an African male with a White female and, in the case of presenting a family, with mixed-race children. The advertising industry spent £46.7 billion last year, with the UK Government spending another £449 million. They didn’t do that to give us a consumer choice: they did it to tell us what to be. Identity is the ultimate consumer choice, and White girls, who are the demographic most susceptible to advertising, are being told to pair up with African men.

But as powerful as advertising and other forms of propaganda are in controlling our desires and the behaviour that realises them, there are other reasons, I think, why White girls are choosing Africans.

The first is, for thirty years now, White boys and men have been told from the moment they are born that they are shit, that being White is something to be ashamed of, that our history is a series of crimes. They have been relentlessly indoctrinated in schools, the media and entertainment industry to hate themselves, and, crucially, that the sexuality of White males is criminal.

Years ago, this idea was first formulated by radical feminists with such anti-men statements as ‘all men are rapists’. But as we see today, when the same radical feminists that parroted this stuff are silent about the unprecedented rise in the rape of White women by African and South Asian immigrants, what they mean is that all White men are racists. The truth, however, is the exact opposite. For under the policy of replacement migration, this extreme statement of radical feminism has come true when describing African and South Asian men. For White women in Britain and Europe, every African and South Asian man is now not merely a potential rapist but a likely one.

Notwithstanding protestations to the contrary from the acolytes of woke, who include a high proportion of White girls but still a tiny proportion of the White female population of Britain, I think White girls know this better than I or any other White man. White women, and particularly White girls, spend a lot of time thinking about men, our behaviour, our desires, what impact this has on them and how they can take best advantage of it.

One of the effects of the 30-years of propaganda against White boys, which continues into their adulthood, is that White men in Britain have become enormously effeminised. I live in London, which I would guess (and hope) is the most effeminate place in Britain, but coming back to England after three years abroad, I’ve been struck by just how effeminate the men of my own race have become. I can’t now, with any certainty, identify a straight man from a gay man. The sibilant tones of gay speech patterns adopted from Californian queer slang have become the norm for middle-class straight White men. And in term of their masculinity, there is very little difference. From what I can see, a straight White man is as likely to risk a kicking or stabbing defending a White woman, even his girlfriend or wife, as a gay man is — which is to say, extremely unlikely.

Another consequence of the effeminisation of White men, particularly White middle-class men, is that White women of child-bearing age are no longer having sex. This also has to do with the evident delight that young women take these days in humiliating young men on social media. That’s another issue; but contrary to the fantasies of woke, men and women are biologically different, and at no time more so than when the body of a young woman is preparing itself, month after month, to have a child. Indoctrinated as this generation is by the nonsense of woke, it’s easy to forget that young females, in particular, are as driven to have sex as young males, and for the woman this means having a child.

Somewhere in the psyche or perhaps libido of White women, the imaginary African immigrant has substituted for the absent child of a generation of White women who are not having children. Until the immigrant rapes her, that is, although I’m not certain even that would dissuade them. Watching footage of White liberal women in Cueta or the shores of Dover hugging African migrants who would rape them in a second suggests there’s a very strong sexual drive behind their apparent insanity.

There’s nothing more irrational than a woman who wants to but can’t have a child, and the crashing birth rates of White women in Britain tell us that they are not — not having children but also, looking around me, not having sex. Between being raped by a gang of African immigrants and no sex, White women, at least in their imagination, have chosen the former. So far, it’s almost exclusively White working-class girls who have been raped, in the hundreds of thousands, by gangs of Muslim men; but over the next few years, under Andy Burnham’s new policy of sending tens of thousands of immigrant men into middle England, White middle-class women are going to find out what it’s like living in a country without men to defend them from these animals.

And the White girls know this. History has shown over and over again that when the men of a country are conquered by the men of another, the women of the conquered country will make allegiances with the conquering men. Perhaps the most famous example of this is the French women who betrayed their country by having sex or entering into relationships with the men of the occupying German forces during World War Two, and they paid for it after liberation; but a similar thing happened in England when English women whose husbands were away fighting to save their country from invasion started similar relationships with the US soldiers stationed over here.

For the majority of women facing a threat to their safety, individual safety trumps notions of national safety, loyalty or patriotism, which are all male ideas.

We see the same dynamic at a much smaller scale every weekend in any pub, like the one I was in. Young women stand back, watch and observe the young men to see who is the alpha male before making their move. In advanced societies that means the wealthiest male or simply the one that the other men defer to for other reasons, either professional or through the force of his personality.

But Britain is not an advanced society anymore. We are a society that has been invaded by millions of men from primitive and backward countries who are raping our women every minute of every day; and our police, law courts, military and state are doing nothing to stop it. On the contrary, they are arresting and imprisoning any White man who dares to defend himself or our women against the invaders.

I don’t blame women for this betrayal. It’s their task, in evolutionary terms, to protect their children, which means protecting themselves; just as it is the task of men to protect women and children. And we’ve failed to do so. I do blame White men for this failure.

White women have seen this, and they’re scared. When White liberal women scream at the top of their voices like frightened children that they have nothing to fear from immigrants, it’s because they hope that, by repeating this obvious lie often enough, it will come true.

And in response to that fear, they have made a choice: that it’s better to be the ‘hoe’ of an African rapist than to be an unprotected White girl surrounded by African and Muslim rapists free to rape them whenever they want, without protection from either the UK state or White men. It’s the same principle that African pimps use to control and live off White prostitutes to whom they offer ‘protection’ from other African rapists and murderers in return for the money the White girls make from selling themselves for sex and, of course, the freedom to rape them whenever they wish to.

White girls today dress like whores, behave like whores, post footage of themselves online behaving like whores, accept being called ‘hoes’ by African men, because the conquest of Britain and the submission of White men to the terms of this conquest have left them exposed, without any other defence, to the lusts and violence of millions of African and Muslim men.

The ongoing grooming, rape and trafficking of upwards of 250,000 British girls by a nationwide network of Muslim rape gangs is not confined either to Muslims, to underage girls, or to the kebab shops, parks and other places they rape our children in. Every White girl in Britain — and indeed across Europe — is undergoing a process of mass grooming, rape and pimping, not in secret but in full daylight, on our streets, in our schools, in our media, online. With the full collaboration of our government, state, law courts, police forces, media, educational, cultural and medical institutions, the White girls of Britain are being turned into sex slaves for our conquerors.

And they know it.


The psyche of the African male, no matter how successful the individual may be, remains branded with the inferiority of his race. Even when rich enough to escape into the White world, he retains their adolescent behaviour. For the African male, White women are the sign of his success over the White male. He treats her, therefore, like his sex slave. Her collaboration in this display is key in her value to the African man as a trophy. For the White women, becoming the slave of an African man is the ultimate rebellion against the Western world, which she calls ‘racist’, ‘patriarchal’, ‘Eurocentric’, ‘White supremacist’ and other words for her adolescent rebellion against her White father, both literal and symbolic. The more the African man mistreats and humiliates her, the greater her rebellion.