The American system over the last 100 years has, through gradualism, become benevolent totalitarianism because it is a seductive system of psychological warfare coupled with a highly oppressive legal system that essentially puts the people in an economic and political straitjacket while keeping them believing that they are free. 

The powers that be at a monopoly corporation punished a thought crime last week.

Not one "progressive" voice blinked an eye. It's likely no one on the left read the memo themselves, only reading the media's redacted versions that removed sourcing and included solely what was deemed most damaging to the memo's author.

That author, engineer James Damore, wrote about a culture of shutting down any opinion that isn't left-leaning, and that what is typical of Silicon Valley's "diversity" drives are effectively anti-diversity.

The media accused Damore and his memo of being "anti-diversity" even though the engineer included an entire section on how to improve diversity efforts without discriminating against anyone. The Washington Post, CNN and the other usual suspects blatantly lied about Damore and the intent and content of his memo.

The corporate response to the left's always-fake "outrage" was typical of left-leaning officials: Shut up, you're fired. There can be no conversation unless it concerns how best to implement their globalist, one-world, elitist principles.

Irony ensued when Damore's former boss, Sundar Pichai wrote in a statement on Damore's firing, "Our co-workers shouldn't have to worry ... each time they open their mouths to speak in a meeting." Yet they should fear for their jobs if they open their mouths through any other medium.

Damore filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board has said he will likely take legal action. Good luck in California's left-leaning courts of "law."

Business is war

Do I believe Silicon Valley's corporate culture fits in with the globalist and fascist corporatist and elitist uber-culture? One employee told Breitbart, "Conform and carry out the rituals, and you'll be rewarded and praised; ask any uncomfortable questions or offend the wrong people, and the threats and public shaming will be swift and ruthless. The religion in this case is a kind of intersectional feminism, its central tenets are Diversity and Inclusion."

Maybe that's why Pichai cancelled a company-wide "diversity" meeting. Employees who had submitted questions for the meeting feared for their "safety" and were worried about being "outed." I suppose they should be, since the ones who lean conservative with their questions will get fired, and the ones who lean left might be exposed for being complicit in the echo chamber.

It's not just the employees that become targets of these companies. They know everything about all their users, and use that information to profit — after getting dubious consent from the users via indecipherable "terms of service" agreements of course. Then they use that information against their own customers and users, banning any posts and videos and points of view they don't like.

An organization waging war against its own members… does this sound familiar in any way? Machiavelli would be proud indeed.

Many of these tech services are free, which means you are the user, but also the product for sale. And they want you to consume their services so they can sell you more effectively… unless you don't agree with them. Then it's "Warning! This content is offensive!"

Just try to watch videos by conservative Lauren Southern on YouTube without giving your consent to view such horrific content as "Why I Hate Pride Parades" (the horror!). Or conservative nonprofit organization Prager University's video on "Why Don't Feminists Fight for Muslim Women?" (Racist! Sexist!). Have a gun blog? That's a content warning.

Any piece of content looking to further true liberty and equality needs a content warning, as far as monopolistic social media and search companies are concerned. Heaven forbid you should write a thoughtful, thorough 10-page analysis. You'll be summarily dismissed from the echo chamber even though you are pro-diversity, and you'll be fired for your analysis even though we know there are differences between the brains of men and women that lead to differences in interests and behavior.

The question might be rolling around in your mind as to why Damore, a researcher at Princeton, Harvard, MIT and so on, would have written such a memo in the first place, given the intolerance shown toward political diversity in his chosen profession and corporate environment?

Damore told Stefan Molyneux in an interview that he wanted to understand the political philosophies that divide us, and he became aware that discussions within an echo chamber aren't discussions between two sides. He said those at his former workplace are blind to "the other side" which doesn't work, since you need two sides in order to have a discussion.

From what I can tell, the Silicon Valley mega-corporation structure only has fake diversity within one side so they can self-congratulate on not being "evil."


Damore said further in the interview that 95 percent of the social sciences lean left, and only study what they want. They only study topics that the left is interested in, and they aren't as critical of their own research as they should be.

The left portrays the right as not understanding science, and as "anti-science," when the truth is that the right simply has other priorities and views, and the 5 percent doesn't study the same things as the 95 percent.

He said the left accuses the right of "denying" climate change and evolution, while the left denies that there are biological differences between men and women.

If you need proof, it wasn't long ago that one of their own, liberal economist Larry Summers, then-Harvard President, said "innate differences" between men and women was one possible explanation for fewer women among the science and engineering faculty. That was enough. The Cult of No Gender, otherwise known as man-loathing feminists, nearly rioted at the notion that men and women could possibly be different, and Summers was forced to resign. Sacrificed to the collective, as I have warned about many times.

Stake through the heart of the elites

Now, kudos to Damore for striving towards understanding. But he will have to take the next step on his own, and see beyond the establishment to grasp the greater agenda of those like the ones who fired him, and who wish to oppress all of us.

In a sense, one could say that the Bernie Sanders candidacy in addition to Trump's showed that a growing number of Americans have become awakened to the fact that they cannot trust the politicians or the government. They have begun to realize the government is their biggest problem and, dare I say, their enemy.

The American system over the last 100 years has, through gradualism, become benevolent totalitarianism because it is a seductive system of psychological warfare coupled with a highly oppressive legal system that essentially puts the people in an economic and political straitjacket while keeping them believing that they are free.

If 2016 was a year of awakening, then 2017 is continuing that trend with items like Damore's memo making the news — and revealing the true anti-diversity that is the establishment and the elites who run monopolistic mega-corporations and who will brook no true diversity of opinion. These monopolies have become the 4th branch of government, dictating what you can say, what you can sell, what you can buy, and even tracking what you do with your own private time in your own private residence.

Through gradualism and altruism, power over us has been given freely to them, a real-life equivalent to the literary symbolism of inviting a vampire into your house. Once in, they are free to do as they wish. In the same vein, it's important to rescind that invitation and kick the vampires out of your private life.

Corporations are not the 4th branch of government. They have no power over you save what you allow. Is your bank tracking you? Find another bank, another institution, another form of savings, or don't use banks at all, except when absolutely necessary. Does Google store your videos, your e-mails, your documents, your passwords, and your phone number? You would have had to give all that to them. Take it back! Use other services.

It seems difficult, but the only way to take back your life from these corporate influences is to literally do just that: take all your information back. Delete all you can from their servers. Change what you can't so their information isn't current.

As long as most people don't feel any direct threat, they relax and let this system run their lives. If you want your freedom, you must open your eyes to the truth that is evident all around you: That the establishment and its minions will continue using you to feed themselves at your expense.

Print this post

Do you like this post?

Add your reaction to this article